[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]Two days before the Woolworths' Annual General Meeting back in November I was invited to talk with 4 senior executives of that company plus 2 auditors. One of the people at the meeting Tom Pockett, Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Directors asked (in so many words):
Date Posted: 09:06 18/12/08 Thu
Author: ramhead
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 165.12.252.111
Subject: I look forward to your campaigns against hawthorn, essendon st kilda and...
In reply to: Paul Bendat 's message, "Paul Bendat is a Crikey stooge" on 22:49 17/12/08 Wed
all the other clubs with pokies then. As well s every single NRL club. Singling out one club when the issue is competition wide is unfair and leaves you open to agenda setting accusations. Particularly when you bob up on the very same day that Stephen Mayne takes a pot shot.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Why have you singled out Woolworths?My notes of the meeting were that I was asked the same question 2 more times.
Whenever you hear these two organisation spruiking themselves they mention "leadership". They also have something else in common; they are both well run organisations and hugely profitable. Neither need pokie revenue to prosper. For both, it has nothing to do with their core business. In my view, neither do a particularly good job in implementing responsible gaming practices.
It is appalling how they are luring families with children into their pokie venues. To make matters worse, Woolworths' associates manage Collingwood's Coach and Horses in Ringwood and promotes it as "Ringwood’s leading family entertainment venue". The venue's pokies and the addictions make the Coach and Horses anything but a family entertainment venue.
And there is a huge downside for both Woolworths and the Magpies.
The success of both their organisations depends upon the goodwill of their brand. The 'Pie's need to recruit and maintain members. They need to sell sponsorships that want to attach the glow of the Magpies brand. Likewise, Woolworths supermarkets, credit cards, insurance, and petrol business depend upon the attractiveness of the Woolworths' brand.
Around 70% of Australians take a negative view of the pokies business.
For this, my last post of 2008, I leave with the question as to why Woolworths and the Collingwood Football Club would want to have their brands and their heritage tainted in anyway by an association with this awful pokies business? I urge both to make their pokie places kid free.
My best wishes to all of you and your families for a healthy and prosperous 2009.




